Wednesday, March 1, 2023

What If and Why Not

Some fans wonder what the team would have looked like if they did sign this player, or didn’t trade that player. However, it’s not as easy as saying that if Chicago had drafted Patrick Mahomes than the Bears would have won two Super Bowls. Because it’s not that simple. It never has been. So let’s look at a couple of major what ifs across sports and see why they’re important to ask, but probably wouldn’t have changed things the way fans might want.

What if the Chicago Bears selected Patrick Mahomes?

In 2017, the Chicago Bears had the 3rd overall pick in the draft. On draft day, the Bears traded picks 3, 67 and 111 in the 2017 draft and third round pick in 2018 to the San Francisco 49ers to move up to the 2 spot. At number 2 overall, the Bears selected quarterback Mitchell Trubisky.

Later that night, the Kansas City Chiefs moved their pick (27) and pick 91, as well as a 2019 first to Buffalo in exchange for the Bills’ 10th overall pick. With that pick, the Chiefs then selected Mahomes.

Since that draft, Mahomes has been to the AFC Championship in five straight seasons, won the MVP twice, won two Super Bowls and was Super Bowl MVP each time. Trubisky was replaced in Chicago by Justin Fields and now backs up Kenny Pickett in Pittsburgh.

But what if Chicago had selected Mahomes 2nd overall? If Chicago does that, Mahomes probably doesn’t sit for the majority of his rookie season, as he did in KC. Instead, with Mike Glennon having started only 4 games, Mahomes is likely thrown into a starting role sometime in the middle of the season. Mahomes doesn’t have offensive-minded head coach Andy Reid to draw up plays for him. Instead, he plays initially for John Fox. He doesn’t have weapons like Kareem Hunt (1,327 rushing yards, 455 receiving yards, 11 total TDs), Tyreek Hill (1,183 receiving yards, 59 rushing yards, 7 TDs) and Travis Kelce (1,038 receiving yards and 8 TD). Granted, those numbers came with Alex Smith running the offense. In Chicago, Mahomes would have had Jordan Howard (1,122 rushing yards, 125 receiving yards, 9 TDs), Josh Bellamy and Kendall Wright (combined 990 receiving yards and 2 TDs), and Dion Sims (180 receiving yards and 1 TD). While Howard had a good year running, the weapons around Mahomes would have been worse than what he had in Kansas City.

Yes, Mahomes is a better athlete and quarterback than Mike Glennon and Mitch Trubisky combined. In Chicago, however, he might not have the chance to reach that potential given that he would have had a different offensive philosophy and less talented (with all due respect) skill players. Everybody’s number probably look better with Mahomes, but can he lead the Bears to the conference championship game with that offensive as it was constructed?

A better what if might be to ask what might have happened if Chicago stays at 3. San Francisco was not likely to draft a QB anyway. If Trubisky does go, they could have selected Mahomes at 3 while keeping their other picks. Pick #67 ended up with New Orleans. They selected Alvin Kamara. Pick 111, ended up with Seattle. They selected S Tedric Thompson. The 2018 pick—which could have ended up a different selection because of the 2017 Bears’ record—was used to select LB Fred Warner. While Thompson isn’t quite the same caliber as the others, the Bears could have, in theory, selected Trubisky or Mahomes at 3 as well as Alvin Kamara and, a year later, Fred Warner. Still, that may not have been enough to win a Super Bowl, let alone two, but the Bears would have arguably been better positioned.

Conclusion: the Bears chose wrong, but that doesn’t mean they’d have two Super Bowls right now.

 

What if the Miami Dolphins sign Drew Brees?

This one is near and dear to my heart as I am a Miami Dolphins fan. In 2006, the then- San Diego Chargers were ready to give the starting position to Phillip Rivers. Drew Brees was coming off a shoulder injury, which left some teams with red flags, including the Dolphins. Not wanting to meet the amount of money Brees was seeking, in part because of questions about the injury, Miami opted to wait and see if the price came down. The New Orleans Saints took advantage and signed Brees to a six-year $60 million deal (which sounds low in 2023 money, but was a pretty good deal in 2006). The Dolphins felt more confident in the injury report for Minnesota Vikings quarterback Daunte Culpepper and traded a second-round pick to Minnesota for Culpepper.

Culpepper started just four games for Miami, going 1-3 while throwing for 929 yards, two TDs and three interceptions. In 2006, Brees started all 16 games, went 10-6 and threw for 4,418 yards, 26 TDs and 11 interceptions. Brees became a staple in New Orleans, leading the team to their first, and so far only, Super Bowl in the 2009 season, and led the Saints for 15 years. Brees is a sure-fire Hall of Famer in 2025 when he becomes eligible.

Miami Dolphins head coach Nick Saban would leave the Dolphins after the 2006 season (his second as head coach) to become the head coach at Alabama. (That seems to have worked out for him). He said in a 2021 article with Sports Illustrated that if the Dolphins had signed Brees, he likely would have stayed, but failing to do so was a big factor into his leaving the team[1]. While that is the case, Saban is not the same coach as then-Saints coach Sean Payton.

Much like the Mahomes scenario above, the players in Miami were different. The training staff was different. The coaching staff was different. While it’s easy to say Brees moves into that role and is still a Hall of Fame quarterback, it’s important to note that perhaps his injury isn’t as well treated long-term with the Miami staff, or it’s at least different. The offense may not be as personalized as Payton was able to do. Maybe Miami isn’t as patient. Regardless, while Brees couldn’t have been worse than Culpepper, it’s far from a guarantee that he has the same success in South Beach.

Conclusion: the Dolphins chose wrong, but it doesn’t mean they would have won big.

What if the Portland Trailblazers selected Michael Jordan?

The Houston Rockets selected Hakeem Olajuwon first overall in 1984. He went on to play in 1,238 games, score 26,946 points and collected 13,748 rebounds over 44,222 minutes played across 18 seasons. He is an MVP, won two NBA titles with the Rockets and was MVP for both of those, and is a Hall of Famer. While Michael Jordan is widely considered the best player of all time, there is no reason to question if this was a good pick or not.

The Portland Trailblazers selected Sam Bowie second. He totaled 511 games played over 10 seasons. He played 14,098 minutes and scored 5,564 points and collected 3,845 rebounds. A respectable career, for sure.

Michael Jordan was selected by the Chicago Bears with the third pick. Over 15 seasons between the Bulls and the Wizards, MJ played 41,011 minutes, scored 32,292 points and collected 6,672 points. He won six NBA Championships, twice winning three in a row. He was Finals MVP for all six. He won five NBA MVPs. He is a Hall of Famer. He is widely regarded as the best player ever. If not the best, he is top three.

So what if Portland landed MJ?

Chicago didn’t yet have the players that often come to mind when thinking of MJ’s championship years. Phil Jackson wasn’t the coach yet. Scottie Pippen was drafted in 1987. Steve Kerr doesn’t become a Bull until 1993. Dennis Rodman doesn’t become a Bull until 1995. So while MJ had a big part in the turnaround, the core pieces were not yet in place.

Portland, however, had one big core player in place at that time that may have helped elevate MJ to even greater heights sooner. They had Clyde Drexler. Clyde didn’t help win a title until 1995 when paired with Houston and Hakeem Olajuwon. The big issue there, however? They technically played the same position. However, at 6’7”, Drexler could have played a hybrid role and Portland could have made it work.

If Jack Ramsay doesn’t work out with the Trailblazers with Clyde and MJ, Phil Jackson could have joined them instead of Chicago. Steve Kerr and Dennis Rodman could also end up in Portland as easily as they did Chicago. Scottie Pippen may not make it there, depending on how the draft shakes out in 1987, but any big piece from Chicago could just as easily have ended up in Portland.

So, that means this is a huge swing and a miss, right?

Not necessarily. If Portland doesn’t unlocked and allow Michael Jordan to become MJ, he may not have dominated the basketball world in the mid-1990s. But, for all we know, MJ becomes injury prone in Portland.

Conclusion: While nothing is guaranteed, Portland probably should have drafted MJ.

These are just three examples of famous what-ifs in sports. There are many others we can and probably will discuss in future posts.

While it’s fun to play out how things would change, it’s not as simple as assuming that the results would automatically transfer. In two of the three instances explored here, the result likely don’t mirror the way it was.

Sometimes, fans get caught up in the what-ifs, when we should focus on what’s next for our teams.

 



[1] https://www.si.com/nfl/dolphins/news/coach-nick-saban-discusses-his-departure-from-miami-dolphins

NBA stats and information found at https://www.basketball-reference.com/

NFL stats and information found at https://www.pro-football-reference.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment